Skip to main content

"Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup"

People say that evil isn't very interesting; it's the human response to evil that can hold our attention. I think that's true in "Bad Blood." Elizabeth Holmes--the monster at the center of the story--doesn't seem to have much depth. She doesn't really show signs of genuine contrition, and it's never clear in the story that she is wrestling with the scary implications of what she is doing. For that reason, she can be a bit tiresome--as a character. To me, the real stars of "Bad Blood" are the people who struggle against Holmes: a young man whose nonagenarian grandfather tells him to just fall in line with EH, a guy who ends up committing suicide because the pressures of working with EH are too great, and an outspoken lab expert who takes photos of various problems in EH's facilities (among many other characters).

It worries me that Adam McKay is involved with the Holmes story, because McKay tends to have contempt for his characters, and that approach isn't consistently interesting. (I can already picture a smug McKay film in which the director tells us over and over what we already know: Elizabeth Holmes is a bad person. We saw a version of that with "Vice" in the past several months.)

Reading "Bad Blood," I also thought of Janet Malcolm, who has paid a great deal of attention to the ways in which journalists are opportunists. The author of "Bad Blood" positions himself as a kind of hero, but I wonder if, really, he feels a sense of identification with Elizabeth Holmes. Both the author and Holmes will do what it takes to get what they want. For the author, this means pursuing interviews with a whistleblower who is then terrorized by Holmes's lawyers. The author admits to feeling "twinges of guilt" when he learns what his source has gone through, but I'm curious if the author himself (given his experience in journalism) could have anticipated some of this terror, and could have supported his source more actively. Just a thought.

Another fascinating part of "Bad Blood": the romance of biochemistry! Who spends hours and hours sitting around thinking about how bizarre blood is? It seems to me that the idea Holmes had--to revolutionize how we analyze blood samples--was a good and seductive one. She just didn't have any discipline or common sense or training--any ability to realize her own dreams. But if someone really could extract a droplet of blood at home--and know within minutes if any serious diseases were brewing under the skin? That's pretty sexy. It's even inspiring. You can maybe understand why Henry Kissinger and Chelsea Clinton and Joe Biden, among others, found themselves enchanted by Holmes.

Those are my initial thoughts--not really a book review. I loved "Bad Blood" and devoured it in two days. I'm excited to see the HBO film tonight.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Host a Baby

-You have assumed responsibility for a mewling, puking ball of life, a yellow-lab pup. He will spit his half-digested kibble all over your shoes, all over your hard-cover edition of Jennifer Haigh's novel  Faith . He will eat your tables, your chairs, your "I {Heart] Montessori" magnet, placed too low on the fridge. When you try to watch Bette Davis in  Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte , on your TV, your dog will bark through the murder-prologue, for no apparent reason. He will whimper through Lena Dunham's  Girls , such that you have to rewind several times to catch every nuance of Andrew Rannells's ad-libbing--and, still, you'll have a nagging suspicion you've missed something. Your dog will poop on the kitchen floor, in the hallway, between the tiny bars of his crate. He'll announce his wakefulness at 5 AM, 2 AM, or while you and another human are mid-coitus. All this, and you get outside, and it's: "Don't let him pee on my tulips!" When...

Josh at Five

 Joshie's project is "flexibility"; the goal is to see that a plan is just an idea, not a gospel, not a guarantee. This is difficult. Yesterday, we went to a restaurant--billed as "open," with unlocked doors--and the owner informed us of an "error in advertising." But Joshie couldn't accept the word "closed." He threw himself on the floor, then climbed on the furniture. I felt for the owner, until he nervously made a reference to "the glass windows." He imagined that my child might toss himself through a sealed window, like Mary Katherine Gallagher, or like Bruce Willis, in "Die Hard." Then--thank the Lord!--I was able to laugh. The thing that really has therapeutic value for Joshie is: a firetruck. If we are out in public, and he spots a parked truck, he wants to climb on each surface. He breathlessly alludes to the wheels, the door, the windows. If an actual fire station ("fire ocean," in Joshie's parla...

My Anniversary

 What do gay men give each other, after seven years of marriage? Tickets: Bernadette Peters, in concert. Stephen Sondheim identified BP's "Sunday in the Park" performance as one of the three or four great achievements he himself had witnessed, in musical theater history. Other actors speak of Bernadette as a teacher. Andrew Rannells has described a wish to see BP in "Follies," alone, just on a quiet afternoon, when "BP might break my heart." Victoria Clark has written about studying BP--collecting insights--in the same way the novelist Jami Attenberg has borrowed extensively from "Olive Kitteridge," by Elizabeth Strout. No one is better at seeming wounded. BP has such extraordinary access to personal pain, you feel you're overhearing a private confession. I have loved her work from my high-school years onward. My spouse allowed me to screen a clip from "A Little Night Music"; he watched from start to finish, without fidgeting or...