Anthony Horowitz speaks about the construction of "the twist" in a mystery novel. A good writer has to play fair--all the clues need to be available to the reader just as they are to the detective. In a well-done mystery, the clues seem to lead you down one particular path--but another path is just as plausible. In the new Horowitz novel, an actor playing Daniel Hawthorne is murdered. We first think that the actor was the intended victim. But what if the killer was going after the real-life figure the actor was playing--the killer saw the name "Daniel Hawthorne" on a trailer and became confused--? The killer then killed the actor, thinking that the actor was Daniel Hawthorne. We accept this conjecture. But the question is this: *Should* we accept the conjecture? I was raised on Agatha Christie. In college, I discovered PD James, who is like the upgraded iPhone version of Agatha Christie. Depending on the day, I might tell you that PD James is my all-time favorite w...
I struggled with "Is God Is." We know we aren't in the realm of realism--because the two protagonists refer to their mother as "God," and they're being sincere. I've thought a fair amount about the off-putting title, and I assume it's a reference to the idea of twins. The two starring roles are for twins. They are daughters of God. One on each side of God. We're in the world of the ancient Greeks. God's husband throws God in a bathtub--then sets Her on fire. Many years later, God is out for revenge. She is too damaged to fight. So she sends her daughters to kill their father. This story evokes thoughts of Medea, Oedipus, the House of Atreus. God's nurses are like the Furies. We might also wonder if God is telling the whole truth--for example, why isn't there a clear explanation of how the two daughters ended up *next to* their mother in the bathtub? The movie's success depends on the actor playing Man--and, here, the director was...