I felt that "The Pitt" became slightly preachy and monotonous toward the end of the first season, but I was still engaged. What interested me was the choice to focus on doctors' moments of insanity--we all know that many of the patients are kooky, but the human frailty of the caretakers is sometimes (elsewhere) overlooked. Dr. Samira Mohan seems "high on life"--she wants to keep on picking up cases even as she enters her fifteenth hour of work. A colleague observes that she is just feeling a surge of adrenaline and she will very quickly crash. We next see Dr. Mohan crying, alone, in the bathroom--then scrubbing away the tears and leaving the workplace. This was a subtle, insightful story. It resisted the siren song of melodrama. It also seemed to have been lifted from a doctor's actual testimony--like one of the monologues in Studs Terkel's "Working." The protagonist--Dr. Robby--cannot tolerate the "vax denial" tics of a particular f...
I find deep pleasure in disliking something I'm "supposed to" like -- and that's how I feel about the current revival of "Ragtime." Everything about this effort seems misguided. It's a resuscitation of a mediocre show that does not need to be resuscitated. Also, the "bold vision" seems to be this: "We've taken everything from the original production and made it slightly worse !" It's like the 1990s "Ragtime" -- but without a set. It's like the 1990s "Ragtime" -- but without Audra McDonald. It's like the 1990s "Ragtime" -- but without an effective publicity team. (It seemed especially unfortunate that the production announced a "first choice" Sarah, only to lose her. The team then announced a "second choice" Sarah, only to lose her. "Grab your wallet and come on out for.... our *third* choice !") "Why look for answers where none occur?" The earnest,...