Skip to main content

Gal Gadot: "Snow White"

 My daughter and I survived only one hour of the new "Snow White"; Susie complained that the Evil Queen was too loud and that Grumpy was "bad to look at."


I didn't think Gal Gadot was too loud, but I agree with many critics that the performance is regrettable; how did this push past the editing process? I became distracted by considering various performers with actual musical-theater ability who would be better in the role. Heather Headley, Sherie Rene Scott, Anika Noni Rose, Annaleigh Ashford, Renee Elise Goldsberry, Laura Benanti--these are the names that came to mind.

Also, I thought about Stephen Sondheim and his stinging words for Diane Paulus. Sondheim became irritated when Paulus imagined that she was wiser than Ira Gershwin; Paulus would rescue "Porgy and Bess" by making it "more enlightened." Sondheim suggested that there is a difference between operatic grandeur and kitchen-sink realism; the fact that something is not "gritty and realistic" is not, by definition, an automatic deficit.

This was my problem with the new "Snow White." Look back at the cartoon, which is nearly perfect. There is very little by way of throat-clearing; the Evil Queen is simply there, at the start, and she is terrifying. Also, we aren't asked to think in depth about the working lives of the Seven Dwarfs; these guys simply emerge, and the story races forward. I will always scratch my head when Disney says, "We're going to take an essentially airtight story and tweak it by making it longer." It's like "improving" the David sculpture, in Florence, by using a coat of gold spray paint.

Also, it seems clear that Disney wants to suggest something egalitarian by having the new Snow White enlist the Dwarfs in a housecleaning mission. Heaven forbid that one character selflessly clean rooms for another! I want to suggest that this editorial choice was an additional misstep. In the original "Snow White," the heroine cleans the Dwarfs' cottage as a gesture of thanks; she is saying, "Thanks for opening your home to a stranger." Is this so objectionable, so misguided; does it really need to be rewritten?

Rent the cartoon. That's an expenditure that will not disappoint you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Host a Baby

-You have assumed responsibility for a mewling, puking ball of life, a yellow-lab pup. He will spit his half-digested kibble all over your shoes, all over your hard-cover edition of Jennifer Haigh's novel  Faith . He will eat your tables, your chairs, your "I {Heart] Montessori" magnet, placed too low on the fridge. When you try to watch Bette Davis in  Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte , on your TV, your dog will bark through the murder-prologue, for no apparent reason. He will whimper through Lena Dunham's  Girls , such that you have to rewind several times to catch every nuance of Andrew Rannells's ad-libbing--and, still, you'll have a nagging suspicion you've missed something. Your dog will poop on the kitchen floor, in the hallway, between the tiny bars of his crate. He'll announce his wakefulness at 5 AM, 2 AM, or while you and another human are mid-coitus. All this, and you get outside, and it's: "Don't let him pee on my tulips!" When...

On Being Alive

Life, you’re beautiful (I say) you  just couldn’t get more fecund, more   befrogged  or  nightingaley , more   anthilful  or  sproutsprouting . I’m trying to court life’s favour, to  get into its good g races ,  to  anticipate its whims. I’m always the first to bow, always  there where it can see me with  my humble, reverent face, soaring  on the wings of rapture, falling  under waves of wonder.... This is the opening of "Allegro Ma Non Troppo," a poem by Szymborska. The speaker is a powerless courtier; life itself is Henry VIII. You try to make the King happy.  The speaker thinks she can please life itself by being appropriately joyous, soaring "on wings of rapture," falling "under waves of wonder." If you demonstrate enough wonder and rapture, you might impress God, and then God might reward you with an easy pathway. Of course life doesn't actually work this way, an...

Josh at Five

 Joshie's project is "flexibility"; the goal is to see that a plan is just an idea, not a gospel, not a guarantee. This is difficult. Yesterday, we went to a restaurant--billed as "open," with unlocked doors--and the owner informed us of an "error in advertising." But Joshie couldn't accept the word "closed." He threw himself on the floor, then climbed on the furniture. I felt for the owner, until he nervously made a reference to "the glass windows." He imagined that my child might toss himself through a sealed window, like Mary Katherine Gallagher, or like Bruce Willis, in "Die Hard." Then--thank the Lord!--I was able to laugh. The thing that really has therapeutic value for Joshie is: a firetruck. If we are out in public, and he spots a parked truck, he wants to climb on each surface. He breathlessly alludes to the wheels, the door, the windows. If an actual fire station ("fire ocean," in Joshie's parla...