Skip to main content

On Judgment

Tolerance and forbearance aren't great skills of mine.

I can feel murderous rage on the train from NYC. I felt it yesterday, just because the woman across from me was typing too loudly on her laptop. Her meaty paws clacking, clacking, clacking away. Assaulting the keys. Typing whatever inane thoughts she had into her "Google Slides," because those thoughts simply could not wait.

Once, I sat with my shrink in a movie theater. My shrink has exquisite Old World manners. We sat, and the guy in front of us flashed his iPhone. Time for texting! My blood pressure soared. Surely, there was no solution--no option but to simmer in rage for the duration of the two-hour Italian film we had signed on for. But my shrink approached this stranger and gave a beautiful speech. He made it seem as if *he himself* were the problem. As if, in a just world, everyone would be allowed to text all the time, in all contexts--funerals, weddings, UN summits. As if people requiring full-dark in a movie theater were the people who had really lost their minds.

My shrink gave this speech--and the stranger listened, and apologized, and graciously pocketed his cell phone. I felt as if I had landed on an alien planet.

So chaotic is my inner life, I really can't stand aberrant behavior from others. This is the definition of being a control freak. Other teachers look upon their small students and find the chatter soothing: The chatter is like the pleasant babbling of a tiny brook. I can't function that way. If I have arbitrarily declared that there will be silence, and there isn't silence? My pulse shoots through the roof.

I've noticed that the people most inclined to function well, socially, are the people who are tolerant with themselves. They're the people who can shrug and laugh and say, "I'm wrong! Well, it's certainly not the first time I'm in error." Or: "I'm most definitely a fallible human being." They're the people who can say: "I'm sorry, I screwed up; I should have thought that through more carefully." They can say this even *when they are truly not in the wrong*...because their egos are secure, and it costs them very little to be seen as human, flawed, prone to making mistakes.

There's that cliche about your Jungian shadow: It's the people who are most candid about their imperfection who are actually the soundest people, the people with their feet planted most firmly on the ground. It's the most guarded, most defensive people whom you need to worry about.

And there's a (deliberately ironic) thought from Anne Lamott, as well: Never go out if you're imperfect. If you insist on going out, in your sublunary state, then at least have the grace to feel deeply ashamed and chagrined AT ALL TIMES.

Well, I know myself, more and more. I know I'm rigid and judgmental; I know my rigidity leads to nervousness and then to error; and I know that my inability to admit to error then causes me to reach for defensiveness (and further embarrassment).

Perhaps things will change. Perhaps not. At least I can feel some fondness toward my own wacky self!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Host a Baby

-You have assumed responsibility for a mewling, puking ball of life, a yellow-lab pup. He will spit his half-digested kibble all over your shoes, all over your hard-cover edition of Jennifer Haigh's novel  Faith . He will eat your tables, your chairs, your "I {Heart] Montessori" magnet, placed too low on the fridge. When you try to watch Bette Davis in  Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte , on your TV, your dog will bark through the murder-prologue, for no apparent reason. He will whimper through Lena Dunham's  Girls , such that you have to rewind several times to catch every nuance of Andrew Rannells's ad-libbing--and, still, you'll have a nagging suspicion you've missed something. Your dog will poop on the kitchen floor, in the hallway, between the tiny bars of his crate. He'll announce his wakefulness at 5 AM, 2 AM, or while you and another human are mid-coitus. All this, and you get outside, and it's: "Don't let him pee on my tulips!" When...

The Death of Bergoglio

  It's frustrating for me to hear Bergoglio described as "the less awful pope"--because awful is still awful. I think I get fixated on ideas of purity, which can be juvenile, but putting that aside, here are some things that Bergoglio could have done and did not. (I'm quoting from a survivor of sexual abuse at the hands of the Church.) He could levy the harshest penalty, excommunication, against a dozen or more of the most egregious abuse enabling church officials. (He's done this to no enablers, or predators for that matter.) He could insist that every diocese and religious order turn over every record they have about suspected and known abusers to law enforcement. Francis could order every prelate on the planet to post on his diocesan website the names of every proven, admitted and credibly accused child molesting cleric. (Imagine how much safer children would be if police, prosecutors, parents and the public knew the identities of these potentially dangerous me...

Raymond Carver: "What's in Alaska?"

Outside, Mary held Jack's arm and walked with her head down. They moved slowly on the sidewalk. He listened to the scuffing sounds her shoes made. He heard the sharp and separate sound of a dog barking and above that a murmuring of very distant traffic.  She raised her head. "When we get home, Jack, I want to be fucked, talked to, diverted. Divert me, Jack. I need to be diverted tonight." She tightened her hold on his arm. He could feel the dampness in that shoe. He unlocked the door and flipped the light. "Come to bed," she said. "I'm coming," he said. He went to the kitchen and drank two glasses of water. He turned off the living-room light and felt his way along the wall into the bedroom. "Jack!" she yelled. "Jack!" "Jesus Christ, it's me!" he said. "I'm trying to get the light on." He found the lamp, and she sat up in bed. Her eyes were bright. He pulled the stem on the alarm and b...