Skip to main content

The Enthusiast: Richard Yates

...You speak of your Army comrades as "brutally stupid." I too am surrounded by the type, and can find little compassion for them. Have you read Farrell's Studs Lonigan? Do so, and you will find the majority of my classmates in its pages. They are without minds; they are without purpose. They think it "Hot sh*t" to roll in the bed of some downtrodden whore and to talk of it lasciviously afterwards. I am not shocked by their antics -- they amuse me-- but I find it depressing to realize that these are specimens of the finest America has to offer in her young manhood. And if this is what one encounters in the V-12, I can imagine that the caliber is still lower in a unit such as yours, which must include the very dregs of society. Well, C'est la guerre.

With regard to religion, I suppose this will startle you (remembering our talks at school about Schopenhauer, etc.) but I am no longer an atheist. In the past several months I have taken honest stock of my philosophical attitudes, and have found to my surprise that Christianity is no longer the anathema I once thought it to be. I can understand now why the greatest thinkers, the most enlightened minds in all of our Western culture have propounded the Christian ideal and the Christian ethic in one form or another.....

-This is a quotation from a fictional letter in Richard Yates's "A Special Providence." In its crazy pretentiousness, it seems very, very real. I wonder if Yates actually received this letter--or something very close to it--when he was fighting. If not, if he simply invented this letter, then I'm in awe.

-The young writer of the letter is clearly very silly. He puts all of his comrades into one vague group, then announces his superiority. (What better way to confirm--between the lines--that you are really anything but superior?) He commands his friend to read Farrell, with a weirdly archaic choice of verbiage: "Do so." He relies heavily on cliche: "I'm not shocked by their antics -- they amuse me...." "I find it depressing to realize...." And, most strikingly, he is flatly condescending to the person he is addressing in this very letter. ("I can imagine the caliber is still lower in a unit such as yours....") This is a person whose self-image is far, far off from objective reality. I wince when I read the paragraphs because I see some of my own fatuousness in each sentence. Don't you? No one can create this sensation the way Yates can.

-Because he is Yates, this writer doesn't stop at the silliness. It's not just facile mockery that the writer is going for here. In the next paragraph, quietly, Yates decides to rip your heart out. The chatter about Christianity is obviously covering an admission that the fictional letter-writer can't make: "I'm afraid I'm going to die." The poignancy of the sentiment--and the fact that the sentiment goes unstated--seems, to me, almost overwhelming. This is classic Yates: "I recognize human absurdity, but I also feel for humans. Compassion and satire in one package." I find this inspiring.

-Some people say "A Special Providence" is Yates's weakest novel; I think it is. (Others argue for "Disturbing the Peace," but I actually was swept up in "Peace," and I wasn't--consistently--in "Providence.") To me, the problem with "Providence" is that you care very deeply about the mom, and you don't care so much about Robert. (That said, the NYTimes critic argued exactly the opposite.)

-I like novels that attempt to answer the question: "How are we supposed to live?" (Or, better, novels that simply raise this question in new ways.) But novels whose action is set on a battlefield feel boring to me: The young soldier's actions are somewhat constrained. His options are limited. So my mind wanders. (That said, I enjoyed the cringe-worthy faux-romance between Prentice and Quint. It ends the only way it can, with Quint exploding in response to Prentice's neediness. "Damn it: I'm not your father!")

-Despite my impatience with "Providence," the novel is often admirable. I'm fascinated by George, who disappears from Robert's life, and who pays for his disappearance by tacitly enabling Alice's extravagance. (George complains, but it's clear the broken George/Alice system is, in some weird way, appealing for both George and Alice.) I also like this about Yates: He is aware that most human "moves" arise from a mixture of motives, and very often among those motives you'll find some opportunism. Again and again, in a Yates scenario, two silently ambivalent characters seem to be friends, but as time drags on and relations fray, the formerly-unmentioned opportunism becomes unavoidable. Home truths are exposed. People behave childishly. Matters are left "undone." Messes are left "behind."

-Yates did have favorite ideas and twists, and you may find the Alice portions of "Providence" reminding you strongly of "The Easter Parade." (One sister even goes to another for help, and the interlude ends badly, just as "Easter Parade" narrates, in an only superficially-different set of circumstances.) But: You love whom you love. Yates could have told his story of disillusionment and bad faith a trillion more times, and I still would have followed him again and again.

-In George Pelecanos's new novel, GP describes a young man who seeks out tough, enterprising protagonists to draw strength from. There must be something wrong with me. My favorite literary companions are not heroes; they're not, say, Captain America or even Inspector Dalgliesh. My favorites are the "losers" in a Yates novel. Those losers make me feel less alone. They seem to capture important truths about the human condition--at least as I see it. C'est la vie. C'est la guerre!

P.S. Which Yates novels should you read? "Rev. Road" and "Easter Parade." I also have a soft spot for "A Good School" and "Cold Spring Harbor."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Host a Baby

-You have assumed responsibility for a mewling, puking ball of life, a yellow-lab pup. He will spit his half-digested kibble all over your shoes, all over your hard-cover edition of Jennifer Haigh's novel  Faith . He will eat your tables, your chairs, your "I {Heart] Montessori" magnet, placed too low on the fridge. When you try to watch Bette Davis in  Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte , on your TV, your dog will bark through the murder-prologue, for no apparent reason. He will whimper through Lena Dunham's  Girls , such that you have to rewind several times to catch every nuance of Andrew Rannells's ad-libbing--and, still, you'll have a nagging suspicion you've missed something. Your dog will poop on the kitchen floor, in the hallway, between the tiny bars of his crate. He'll announce his wakefulness at 5 AM, 2 AM, or while you and another human are mid-coitus. All this, and you get outside, and it's: "Don't let him pee on my tulips!" When...

Joshie

  When I was growing up, a class birthday involved Hostess cupcakes. Often, the cupcakes would come in a shoebox, so you could taste a leathery residue (during the party). Times change. You can't bring a treat into a public school, in 2024, because heaven knows what kind of allergies might lurk, in unseen corners, in the classroom. But Joshua's teacher will allow: a dance party, a pajama day, or a guest reader. I chose to bring a story for Joshua's birthday (observed), but I didn't think through the role that anxiety might play in this interaction. We talk, in this house, quite a bit about anxiety; one game-changer, for J, has been a daily list of activities, so that he knows exactly what to expect. He gets a look of profound satisfaction when he sees the agenda; it doesn't really matter what the specific events happen to be. It's just about knowing, "I can anticipate X, Y, and Z." Joshua struggled with his celebration. He wore his nervousness on his f...

Josh at Five

 Joshie's project is "flexibility"; the goal is to see that a plan is just an idea, not a gospel, not a guarantee. This is difficult. Yesterday, we went to a restaurant--billed as "open," with unlocked doors--and the owner informed us of an "error in advertising." But Joshie couldn't accept the word "closed." He threw himself on the floor, then climbed on the furniture. I felt for the owner, until he nervously made a reference to "the glass windows." He imagined that my child might toss himself through a sealed window, like Mary Katherine Gallagher, or like Bruce Willis, in "Die Hard." Then--thank the Lord!--I was able to laugh. The thing that really has therapeutic value for Joshie is: a firetruck. If we are out in public, and he spots a parked truck, he wants to climb on each surface. He breathlessly alludes to the wheels, the door, the windows. If an actual fire station ("fire ocean," in Joshie's parla...