Skip to main content

Adnan

"The Case Against Adnan Syed" has started, and here a few items to bear in mind, if you're not yet fully obsessed:

*A great deal hinges on cell-phone data. One side argues that information from cell-phone towers is reliable; the other side argues the opposite. The pro-Adnan side is very excited to suggest that you can't trust the towers, but it's important to note that the prosecution has never backed down from its "we-trust-the-towers" stance.

*The HBO show may have crippled itself. Vox argues--intelligently--that if you really want to make someone look innocent, then you must first start with a serious examination of the counterarguments. This wins you credibility. If you *begin* by saying, Look, we know he had a history of being possessive and controlling, and he once scribbled something about wanting "to kill," and his girlfriend once asked a teacher to lie for her because she was so afraid of Adnan....If you *acknowledge* all of these unpleasant things and discuss them *before* getting to your own views on the matter, then you look fearless and worthy of trust.

The HBO show absolutely did not take this approach. Which could become a problem.

*A great deal hinges, also, on Don. Why was this guy in his twenties dating a high-school student? Why didn't he return police calls before 1:30 am on the morning after Hae went missing? If Hae told a friend she was going to meet Don--then disappeared--why didn't Don think this was odd (well before 1:30 am)? Did the meeting between Don and Hae really take place?

And why was Don hitting on Hae's friend Debbie--another high-school student--very soon after Hae's disappearance?

*Hae Min Lee's family resents all the attention now given to the case. I understand that. But if someone is behind bars for unjust reasons, then isn't more attention necessary? Who says that one side *really knows* what happened? You don't get to claim that here (at least not yet)--even when you are a person in a great deal of (inconceivable) pain.

*The story is (maybe) actually done. Just as HBO was debuting its new show, a court was throwing out Adnan's appeal. He had made it very far. It looked like he would get a new day in front of a jury. But it seems that new day won't happen. The judicial system is weird. There often seem to be loopholes I don't know about and don't understand. So Adnan's side is saying, We will continue to fight. And maybe there's truth to that. Anyway: My main reaction? Michael Peterson *did* get a new day in court, and that guy seems guilty as sin to me. So: You're telling me that Adnan Syed seems *much, much* more obviously guilty than Michael Peterson? I'm curious to see if we'll ever learn why.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Host a Baby

-You have assumed responsibility for a mewling, puking ball of life, a yellow-lab pup. He will spit his half-digested kibble all over your shoes, all over your hard-cover edition of Jennifer Haigh's novel  Faith . He will eat your tables, your chairs, your "I {Heart] Montessori" magnet, placed too low on the fridge. When you try to watch Bette Davis in  Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte , on your TV, your dog will bark through the murder-prologue, for no apparent reason. He will whimper through Lena Dunham's  Girls , such that you have to rewind several times to catch every nuance of Andrew Rannells's ad-libbing--and, still, you'll have a nagging suspicion you've missed something. Your dog will poop on the kitchen floor, in the hallway, between the tiny bars of his crate. He'll announce his wakefulness at 5 AM, 2 AM, or while you and another human are mid-coitus. All this, and you get outside, and it's: "Don't let him pee on my tulips!" When...

Joshie

  When I was growing up, a class birthday involved Hostess cupcakes. Often, the cupcakes would come in a shoebox, so you could taste a leathery residue (during the party). Times change. You can't bring a treat into a public school, in 2024, because heaven knows what kind of allergies might lurk, in unseen corners, in the classroom. But Joshua's teacher will allow: a dance party, a pajama day, or a guest reader. I chose to bring a story for Joshua's birthday (observed), but I didn't think through the role that anxiety might play in this interaction. We talk, in this house, quite a bit about anxiety; one game-changer, for J, has been a daily list of activities, so that he knows exactly what to expect. He gets a look of profound satisfaction when he sees the agenda; it doesn't really matter what the specific events happen to be. It's just about knowing, "I can anticipate X, Y, and Z." Joshua struggled with his celebration. He wore his nervousness on his f...

Josh at Five

 Joshie's project is "flexibility"; the goal is to see that a plan is just an idea, not a gospel, not a guarantee. This is difficult. Yesterday, we went to a restaurant--billed as "open," with unlocked doors--and the owner informed us of an "error in advertising." But Joshie couldn't accept the word "closed." He threw himself on the floor, then climbed on the furniture. I felt for the owner, until he nervously made a reference to "the glass windows." He imagined that my child might toss himself through a sealed window, like Mary Katherine Gallagher, or like Bruce Willis, in "Die Hard." Then--thank the Lord!--I was able to laugh. The thing that really has therapeutic value for Joshie is: a firetruck. If we are out in public, and he spots a parked truck, he wants to climb on each surface. He breathlessly alludes to the wheels, the door, the windows. If an actual fire station ("fire ocean," in Joshie's parla...