A friend of mine was being treated in a local hospital that specializes in treating her particular type of cancer. I had come to visit this friend, this very dear old friend whom I had not seen in several years, and whom, given the gravity of her illness, I might not see again....
The new Sigrid Nunez novel concerns a writer facing two kinds of despair. In one corner, the writer's cancer-plagued friend (who seems to be Susan Sontag, or Sontag-adjacent) wants help with the process of committing suicide. In another corner, another friend (who seems to be Jonathan Franzen, or Franzen-adjacent) can't stop shouting about the coming apocalypse.
One situation "comments on" the other. The Sontag character feels she is in a burning building and must jump; but maybe the burning is manageable, and maybe the pain of another day isn't something she fully wants to reject. Maybe suicide won't happen. And the Franzen character feels that life, now, is hollow and inexcusable; having children now is inexcusable; but of course the Franzen character continues to take pleasure in his grandchildren and to consume the Earth's resources for his own activities.
This is the entire story. The Nunez characters--unforgettable characters--seem just on the brink of surrendering to despair. And yet they persist. They have a hunger for finding out what happens next.
There is nothing sentimental in this book, and very little in the book is joyous. Nunez certainly doesn't present an "answer" to the problem of climate change, and she doesn't tell you what to do if you are dying. But--and Nunez basically acknowledges this in the book--there is something weirdly uplifting about having your own predicament spelled out for you in precise, rigorous, unsparing sentences. Nunez knows what it is like to be alive in America right now--and so, at the least, when you're reading this book, you feel you are not alone.
Nunez won the National Book Award in 2018; it was a case of a truly great and thrilling novel winning this particular award. (That rarely happens.) Nunez deserves to win once again, in 2021.
This is a good book to read in the midst of the RBG discussions, and it's a good book to read really at any point, I think. It won't grow old.
P.S. Just another thought on Nunez's willingness to be provocative. I'm going to quote from the book again. I don't think Nunez actually agrees with the Franzen character here. But it's still an arresting, startling passage. I keep remembering it. The contrarian takes on mindfulness:
How sad, he said, to see so many among the most creative, those from whom we might have hoped for inventive solutions, instead embracing personal therapies that promoted detachment, a focus on the moment, equanimity in the face of worldly cares. Self-care, relieving anxiety, avoiding stress: these had become some of our society's highest goals, he said--higher, apparently, than the salvation of society itself. The mindfulness rage was just another distraction....We should be utterly CONSUMED with dread. Mindful meditation would do absolutely nothing to right the Titanic....It wasn't a compassionate attitude toward others that might have led to timely preventative action......
Comments
Post a Comment