There is a scene in "The Cruelest Month" that nicely illustrates what I dislike about Louise Penny's writing.
Armand Gamache, the hero, is watching his little grandson. The grandson walks too close to a pond. Armand stands to correct the error, and his wife stops him. "Don't," she says. "That is your son's job now."
Touched by this feedback, Armand kisses his wife, in a reverent way. "Thank you," he whispers. He doesn't say the words; he whispers them.
All of this reeks of bullshit. Who says a grandparent can't save a small child from drowning? And, in a marriage, even a functional long-term marriage, might one spouse be tempted to say to the other, in a peevish tone, "I wasn't actually seeking any guidance here" --?
I sometimes have to take a few deep breaths so that I don't throw the physical object, the book, across the room.
That said, I like Penny's use of an omniscient narrator. This feels old-fashioned. The narrator closely observes several of the characters, dipping into their thoughts, jumping out, pulling the camera backward, pulling the camera in. A Penny novel feels a bit like "The Sopranos"; I'm often in Tony's point of view, but I'm not *always* in Tony's point of view. Penny also has a curious approach to a villain. A chief antagonist in "The Cruelest Month," Yvette Nichol, seems insufferable: She consistently feels she has the right answer, and she is dismissive and cruel toward colleagues when they seem to waste her time. Yvette's scenes are compelling because Penny clearly has empathy for her; Penny seems to be saying, to the reader, "I know that *you* have behaved this way, as well."
I also like Penny's sense of place, and her decision to do her own thing. These Three Pines novels do not follow several current trends; we don't see an unreliable narrator, or a weird resistance to linear storytelling, or a reliance on reconstructed emails, or text exchanges, or letters-to-the-editor. Penny is writing for herself. I appreciate that.
While I understand your point about Gamache's relationship with his wife (the most treacly of the relationships in her books) I adore the series - it took me through the first years of covid as I escaped over and over into the fictional town of Three Pines - they were a life saver for me! The tv series (netflix, I think) is complicated in many ways - I far prefer the characters in the books!
ReplyDeleteHave not seen the series....what strikes me in the books is that the writer is enjoying her time. This is just evident. Not always the case in fiction! Also -- seems that she is interested in repressed pain, and how this plays a role in small town politics. (For example, in the one I'm reading, Peter finds himself envious of Claire, because of Claire's art. But he can't talk about that, because he is ashamed of the envy.)
DeleteI agree - she's a strong and thoughtful writer. And loves her characters, which makes them lovable (at least to me!)
ReplyDelete