Skip to main content

Rachel McAdams

I can’t call myself a Rachel McAdams super-fan. I haven’t seen “The Notebook” or “About Time.” I would rather eat glass than sit through Terrence Malick’s “To the Wonder” (I’m certain). But I very much appreciate the profound weirdness of McAdams’s career--from Regina George to a Meg Ryan-ish vehicle (“Morning Glory”), to many months of total silence (who does that?), to Brian de Palma, to “Spotlight,” to light comedy. Throw in a Philip Seymour Hoffman spy movie, along with the second season of “True Detective,” where, it seems, McAdams was the only one who managed to win praise. This is a genius weirdo we’re talking about.

If you look on Wikipedia, you’ll see RM does not have any movies currently in production, and this worries me. During her hiatus, she revealed, “I never really wanted to be a movie star. I never wanted to work outside Canada, or outside the theater.” The theater work seems to have occurred during her college years, and I wonder if she’ll ever return to that. She does seem to be a genuine actor--rather than (simply) a movie star. She says her favorite thing about her career is the opportunity to travel, because she gets to study human behavior in many different regions. (Shades of Julianne Moore in that remark!) McAdams certainly wasn’t born into Hollywood life; she is the daughter of a nurse and a truck driver.

Do you know the thing that really fascinates me about Rachel McAdams? Well, two things. First is all the grace she has in “Spotlight.” Her warmth in the excruciating sit-in-this-cafe-and-tell-me-about-your-molestation-history scene. Her solicitude toward her grandmother when she drops the hey-many-Boston-Catholics-are-evil bomb. (A great deal of McAdams’s most powerful work in this movie is actually wordless, and three cheers for the Academy, for recognizing that.) I love McAdams on the fire escape with Mark Ruffalo, as both wrestle with their Catholic pasts, and with the magnitude of what they are doing, or attempting to do, right now. Can you imagine anyone else in this role--as effective as Ms. McAdams?

The second thing: A small thriller from ten-ish years ago. “Red Eye.” This was a Wes Craven movie, and it’s delightful. Its thesis is: “Only Rachel McAdams can save the world.” Who would disagree? The story is part-Hitchcock, part-“Nightmare on Elm Street,” and so of course I’m on-board. You can most clearly see the Freddy Krueger influence in the climactic scenes, when Cillian Murphy seems to rise from the dead, and he staggers around a house like a zombie. McAdams has punctured his vocal cords with a pen, so he has a wheezing ghost-voice, and he has covered his neck with an eccentric woman’s scarf (stolen in haste from an airplane passenger). The movie becomes what it has not previously been: a slasher flick. We watch McAdams breathing tensely in closets, behind doorways. Knives are wielded. Creative uses are found for a field-hockey stick. Pure pleasure.

Before the horror interlude, the movie is in Hitchcock terrain. That means the screenwriters find joy in identifying wacky, relatable, human moments. The camera lingers over obnoxious teenagers arguing over small bits of personal property; a lesser screenwriter wouldn’t include this. (The argument turns out to have a big role in the movie’s climax, as well--another grace note.) We see a friendly civilian singing the praises of Dr. Phil. A lunatic becomes too belligerent with a beleaguered flight attendant. A harried hotel employee says, to a client, “Why don’t you write that down on a comment card--then stick it up your ass?” A scar on McAdams’s chest has its own mysterious backstory. “It happened in a parking lot, in broad daylight,” says McAdams, toward the end of the movie. “And you thought, oh well, this was totally random?” asks Murphy, in a faux-kind voice. And McAdams, plotting her big revenge, says: “That’s not what I thought. I thought, Never again.” (Now send that ballpoint pen right into Mr. Murphy’s windpipe!)

Mid-film, the two antagonists have a heated exchange in an airplane bathroom. (One has tried to write an SOS with lipstick on a mirror.) The flight attendants get angry; they think they’re overhearing grunts from the mile-high club. Later, one thrusts a plastic bag at the two antagonists, suggestively, and says: “Trash?” She raises an eyebrow.

You won’t discover the meaning of life in “Red Eye,” but you will get to see McAdams with an intelligent script. And you’ll get to see McAdams kicking ass. And so this is a worthwhile movie. Let’s hope RM is not retreating from the spotlight for another two-year spree....

Comments

  1. She does have a movie coming out! "Disobedience" with Rachel Weisz-they have a love scene! It looks really good.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, right! I guess Wikipedia listed it as completed, rather than pre-production. She did a strange gay pseudo-love story earlier, as well, with Noomi Rapace. That Rachel! I'm happy to hear from you and hope we can get a drink before I head to South Orange in early June!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Host a Baby

-You have assumed responsibility for a mewling, puking ball of life, a yellow-lab pup. He will spit his half-digested kibble all over your shoes, all over your hard-cover edition of Jennifer Haigh's novel  Faith . He will eat your tables, your chairs, your "I {Heart] Montessori" magnet, placed too low on the fridge. When you try to watch Bette Davis in  Hush Hush Sweet Charlotte , on your TV, your dog will bark through the murder-prologue, for no apparent reason. He will whimper through Lena Dunham's  Girls , such that you have to rewind several times to catch every nuance of Andrew Rannells's ad-libbing--and, still, you'll have a nagging suspicion you've missed something. Your dog will poop on the kitchen floor, in the hallway, between the tiny bars of his crate. He'll announce his wakefulness at 5 AM, 2 AM, or while you and another human are mid-coitus. All this, and you get outside, and it's: "Don't let him pee on my tulips!" When...

The Death of Bergoglio

  It's frustrating for me to hear Bergoglio described as "the less awful pope"--because awful is still awful. I think I get fixated on ideas of purity, which can be juvenile, but putting that aside, here are some things that Bergoglio could have done and did not. (I'm quoting from a survivor of sexual abuse at the hands of the Church.) He could levy the harshest penalty, excommunication, against a dozen or more of the most egregious abuse enabling church officials. (He's done this to no enablers, or predators for that matter.) He could insist that every diocese and religious order turn over every record they have about suspected and known abusers to law enforcement. Francis could order every prelate on the planet to post on his diocesan website the names of every proven, admitted and credibly accused child molesting cleric. (Imagine how much safer children would be if police, prosecutors, parents and the public knew the identities of these potentially dangerous me...

Raymond Carver: "What's in Alaska?"

Outside, Mary held Jack's arm and walked with her head down. They moved slowly on the sidewalk. He listened to the scuffing sounds her shoes made. He heard the sharp and separate sound of a dog barking and above that a murmuring of very distant traffic.  She raised her head. "When we get home, Jack, I want to be fucked, talked to, diverted. Divert me, Jack. I need to be diverted tonight." She tightened her hold on his arm. He could feel the dampness in that shoe. He unlocked the door and flipped the light. "Come to bed," she said. "I'm coming," he said. He went to the kitchen and drank two glasses of water. He turned off the living-room light and felt his way along the wall into the bedroom. "Jack!" she yelled. "Jack!" "Jesus Christ, it's me!" he said. "I'm trying to get the light on." He found the lamp, and she sat up in bed. Her eyes were bright. He pulled the stem on the alarm and b...