For a long while, the NY Times paid close attention to true crime books; these books weren't just reviewed; the books were judged and ranked, each December, so you could identify the best of the year.
Also, the Times hopped all over the fifty states and selected a crime chronicle for each state; these titles are outstanding. The Times can direct you to "Judgment Ridge," "After the Eclipse," "American Heiress"--titles you might otherwise overlook.
Recently, it has become fashionable to feel disgusted by true crime. This sort of book repackages a real person's suffering for entertainment. Also, a true crime saga often fails to "center the victim." I have a few thoughts about this. First, it seems clear to me that criminals are often "centered" because criminals are fascinating; if you exist on the margins of society, it's likely (not definite) that you may be an intriguing companion. By contrast, having suffered at the hands of another is not an automatic guarantee that you are a compelling character. (This seems like common sense.) Additionally, I think anything on Earth is fair game for a writer. I wouldn't ban "Macbeth" just because the play ostensibly has its roots in history and some of the material seems "icky."
So I was happy to pick up "Pilgrim's Wilderness." This is like my dream book. It's set in Alaska, in McCarthy, an area so remote that it attracts only insane people. (I'm exaggerating.) In the eighties, the population was approximately twelve, and one of the twelve people lost his mind and killed six neighbors. (Everyone was gathered to wait for the "mail plane." This became known as "The Mail Plane Massacre.")
For years, McCarthy was so isolated, if you wanted to reach the town, you would need to sit in an abandoned cart and pump yourself across with your arms; you would hang from a wire, and you yourself would be the "motor." If the book stopped here, I would be in heaven, but what follows is a captivating Ruby Ridge scenario. A murderer and his family move to the national park; it's illegal for them to be where they are, but the park legislation is murky enough that no one really knows just *how* illegal the homesteading actions are. While the murderer--Papa Pilgrim--escalates his battle with the federal government, he also repeatedly rapes and beats his oldest daughter. (He tells the daughter that his wife is no longer attractive, but he must continue to have children to fulfill a divine commandment. It's the daughter's task to help prepare "the seed.")
The daughter's fortitude becomes the engine of the book's second half; amazingly, this story has a "happy" ending. I read with my jaw on the floor; I could not believe that these events actually occurred in American history, and they occurred in our very recent past.
A sensational book.
Comments
Post a Comment