If there is one substantial flaw in "Merrily We Roll Along," it's the failure to look closely at the character of Frank, Jr. Yes, Jr. is approximately six years old in his final scene--but six-year-olds have wild and colorful interior lives. Ask Beverly Cleary. Since we don't get to know Frank, Jr., we have to do our own work to imagine what it's like to experience Junior's absence (year after year after year). I blame George Furth.
The omission is important, because a big part of Mary's final meltdown has to do with Frank, Jr. In a sharp exchange, Mary "casually" mentions that Junior has thanked her for attending "the big high-school graduation." When Frank, Sr., peevishly observes that he wasn't invited, Mary has the right response: "Neither was I." She doesn't have to say anything more.
This particular moment is the "apex" moment: It's the height of Senior's monstrosity. The entire show is an effort to explain how Frank, Sr., makes it from the happy "Sputnik night" to the painful discussion of Junior's high-school graduation. People who complain that the show is low-stakes--or even that Mary is over-the-top--have failed to pay close attention to the "graduation dialogue."
Other thoughts....
Watching "Merrily" last night, I was delighted by Charlie's evolution as a writer. This is not the main point of the show--but Sondheim is so attentive to detail, you could think *just* about Charlie's writing, and you'd still have a satisfying experience. When Charlie is still struggling to find his voice, he writes clever and slightly shallow pastiche numbers. For example:
Who wants to live in New York?
Who wants the worry, the noise, the dirt, the heat?
Who wants the garbage cans clanging in the street?
(Well, ever since I met you.....)
Additionally:
Goodbye, then, to Ike and the brass...
To years that were cozy but crass...
It's true Ike was icky...
But better him than Dicky!
But better him than Dicky!
Now meet the First Family with class....en masse....
Later, having lived, having studied the painful relationship between Mary and Frank, Charlie discovers his own point of view. He has thoughtful, original remarks about ambivalence:
And if I wanted too much
Was that such a mistake--
At the time?
You never wanted enough.
All right, tough.
I don't make that a crime....
Other writers would just mention Charlie's work--or would hastily try to half-sketch a career for Charlie. But Sondheim makes you *believe* in Charlie's career. He can show you Charlie's evolution. He has really envisioned that evolution--and it's fully plausible. (After "Musical Husbands," Frank, Sr., dries up like Richard Rodgers. No more worthwhile material to quote from. I suspect that this is because Senior has walled himself off from emotional entanglements? If you're closed off, do you really have memorable music left to compose?)
One other note about the film in theaters this weekend. It's hard to watch and *not* conclude that Lindsay Mendez deserved a second Tony Award. Is it really possible that someone gave a better performance in that year? Was Mendez's pregnancy--and her related wavering attendance record--a factor in the Tony voting? I guess we'll never really know.
Comments
Post a Comment