"Scream VII" has left viewers cold--the ending is particularly weak, and the ending is generally the thing that counts when you're forming an opinion. The "Scooby-Doo" revelation feels notably absurd; the paper-thin character development is forgettable.
It's especially puzzling to see Sidney Prescott reconciling with Gale after Gale betrays her. Sidney seems to forget the betrayal--her lines unintentionally suggest that she may have suffered through an off-camera lobotomy. Or a crucial scene was lost in the editing process?
The "Scream" movies are essentially Agatha Christie stories--but, at her best, Christie *did* care about her characters. Val McDermid makes this observation:
In "The Murder at the Vicarage," here’s how we’re introduced to our heroine: “I … sat down between Miss Marple and Miss Wetherby. Miss Marple is a white-haired old lady with a gentle, appealing manner. Miss Wetherby is a mixture of vinegar and gush. Miss Marple is much the more dangerous.” And a few lines later, we meet Miss Hartnell, who is “weatherbeaten and jolly and much dreaded by the poor.”
I'd love to see Kevin Williamson taking his time. Give us a community where the people have complicated, plausible connections with one another. Give us a killer with a beating heart; give us a killer whose motives make sense. Give us quirky, funny details.
I'll always love the first "Scream" movie. Now--in 2026, in the wake of "Scream VII"--fans should make their frustrations known.
Comments
Post a Comment