My husband and I left early from a party; we wanted to watch "SVU."
It didn't matter that the episode seemed to have been written by AI. (Big plot holes troubled me. Parents are upset that Olivia has allowed a child-torturer to walk free; in the next scene, the same parents have cheerfully loaned their own tween to Olivia for an improvised game of baseball. Also, cops talk about the "intelligence" of a particular predator--but the predator drives around with a gun on display, even as a victim is shouting in the trunk.)
At the party in question, Marc and I were pleased to find another SVU fan. Neither my spouse nor I have any idea what we should be discussing at parties--to be gay in a sea of straight people is to be mostly puzzled (hour after hour). I generally find myself summarizing the plots of recent films for an uninterested listener. But meeting another SVU addict--that's a game changer. This particular addict had "intel": If you skip the first few seasons of the Hugh Dancy reboot, you'll find that things "get good" around 2024. Also, the most recent SVU season was a milestone because of its new showrunner; this is the first time in history that the voice behind SVU (Michele Fazekas) has been a woman.
I always send GoogleCal invites for a new episode. (The finale even had an AI-adjacent episode title; it was hastily labeled "Monster.") It's a particular pleasure to watch with my spouse, who tends to be a credulous, breathless viewer. ("He caught that conversation ON A PHONE? He was recording ON HIS IPHONE????!!") We have no plans to see Mariska on Broadway--"audience participation" is not my cup of tea--but, also, life is strange. Tides could change. I'm not convinced I will skate through the run of "Every Brilliant Thing"--without having made my own ticket purchase.
Comments
Post a Comment